Hey Yuv On 05.03.2011, at 04:42, Yuval Levy wrote: > On March 4, 2011 07:58:50 am David Haberthür wrote: >> GSOC should not *only* be about new features. Nonetheless I personally >> would go as far as saying a GUI-overhaul could be considered a new >> feature as well. > > GSoC is first and foremost about students and about code. Google requires > that code is produced. Not documentation or UI design. Thanks for this clarification. I was not fully aware about the constraints, even if they're obvious...
> For UI there is a similar, specific program [0]. IIRC LuminanceHDR benefited > from it (when it was still called qtpfsgui). If Alexandre is still reading > here, he may tell about the experience [snip] > [0] http://season.openusability.org/ That sound interesting, didn't know about it. The application seems to be a bit more low-key than GSOC. Does the mailing-list think an application to overhaul the usability should be considered? Habi -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
