Erik Krause wrote: > So it boils down to extract a proper point spread function from > comparing sharp and blurred version and feed it to the Fourier > filter. At least this is my very limited understanding...
Yes, that's (sort of) what we do in astronomical image processing. But there, FOV is normally small, and the PSF is constant within the FOV. This clearly will not be the case in a wide-field image, leave alone optical distortions by the lens. So I'd say the problem is less determining the PSF, but rather putting that into a model that is valid for the whole FOV.... Pit -- Dr. Peter "Pit" Suetterlin http://www.astro.su.se/~pit Institute for Solar Physics Tel.: +34 922 405 590 (Spain) [email protected] +46 8 5537 8507 (Sweden) [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and other free panoramic software" group. A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
