Sure, in fact I have the camera default set to underexpose by .75 stop 
(which is probably the only thing you can do if you can't shoot RAW.)
But the fact that the detail exist in o1 shows that the detail is lost in 
the transformation, not because of the camera.

On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 4:34:30 PM UTC-6, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>
> Yes, you are right, I didn't look closely enough. The details in the T 
> shirt are more immediately visible, but the textures in the lightest zones 
> now seem uniformly white. In my experience, P&S cameras have a tendency to 
> over-expose pictures. Maybe choosing picture with a better exposition (that 
> is under-exposed by the camera's standards) would give better results.
>
> 2012/12/18 JohnPW <[email protected] <javascript:>>
>
>> Are you sure you didn't mix the two up?
>> o1 is the original and o2 is the output.
>> In my opinion the shirt detail in o2 is very clearly blown out compared 
>> to o1.
>> BTW, I agree that it's best to compare o1 and o2. I included c100 to show 
>> that at least one of the intermediate image isn't blown out at Bugbear 
>> wondered.
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 3:37:17 PM UTC-6, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello JohnPW
>>>
>>> IMO, you shouldn't compare the highlights between any image and c100: 
>>> since c100 is the darkest, it will always show more details in the 
>>> highlights than any other picture. You should always compare with the 
>>> original. Does o2 do better than à1 in the T shirt? I believe so. 
>>>
>>>
>
> -- 
> Frederic Da Vitoria
> (davitof)
>
> Membre de l'April - « promouvoir et défendre le logiciel libre » - 
> http://www.april.org
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

Reply via email to