Exactly!

On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 5:13:57 AM UTC-6, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
>
>  I expect the faux-bracketing to keep the lightest parts of the 
> darkest exposure and the darkest parts of the lightest exposure. If 
> this were true, there should not be any loss in the highlights. 
> Obviously enfuse decided otherwise, but why did he do so and is there 
> any way to make him behave as I expect?
>

I'm expecting this script to increase the amount of information in the 
image (but really, that seems counter to basic laws of thermodynamics.) It 
does seem to do that generally, but clearly information is lost in the 
highlights. Although I don't perceive it, I imagine that information is 
also lost at the dark extremes as well. My suspicion is that it has to do 
with the fact that the tips of the sigmoidal curve are locked down on the 
white and black points and somehow the curve is not acting the way we 
expect at these extremes.

With a real bracketed shot (and with a brackets made from a RAW image) the 
"least exposed" image will give you the most usable detail in the 
highlights. In both cases the curve still has a long tail with a gradual 
slope that spreads the highlights out. With this script, the end points 
remain at exactly the same point on every intermediate image (there's 
nowhere else for them to go.) This forces the extreme tip of the curve to 
compress severely and the points on the curve nearest the endpoint must 
necessarily change radically. I'm not sure what the shape of the curve at 
these extremes would be, but I'm thinking it must have the effect of 
clipping the highlights instead of spreading them out. If so the same thing 
happens at the low end. So my guess is, contrary to what I expected, that 
the extremes get slightly clipped, rather than enhanced, to the benefit of 
the main part of the image.

That's not to say it's bad though. Obviously it the fat part of the image 
benefits. The same is true when you adjust the contrast curves in the 
normal way. Effectively you sacrifice less important information at the 
extremes (or wherever) to emphasize more important information in the 
middle (or wherever.)

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at: 
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx

Reply via email to