On Sat 23-Feb-2013 at 22:35 -0800, Christoph Spiel wrote:
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2013 13:32:38 UTC+1 schrieb Bruno Postle:
Merging nona with enblend/multiblend. Currently we remap each photo
with nona, then enblend/enfuse splits these remapped images into
multilevel pyramids, joins them into a single pyramid which is then
reassembled into a final image.
I'm against this proposal and this for
several reasons.
I'm wary of it because there hasn't been any testing to see if it
would be worthwhile, I'd like to do the experiments.
The only item from my list that is a 'ready to go' summer of code
project is the 'morph to fit' idea, I've done the proof of concept
and it works.
Yuval did an interesting comparison of Hugin/enblend vs. PTGui
stitching equirectangular, and there is clearly something that we
are missing:
https://panospace.wordpress.com/2008/07/28/to-roll-or-not-to-roll-part-i/
--
Bruno
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hugin and
other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
