bugbear wrote on 04.03.15 11:01:
Carl von Einem wrote:
I think microscanning was introduced with the Kontron ProgRes 3012.
That was about 1997 or even earlier, the company was owned by BMW then.
Nice camera system but it needed to be directly connected to a special
PCI-card. There were no NuBus cards available from Kontron so we
needed one of those newer Macs with a PCI slot. I think at the time I
used one of these UMAX Macintosh clones.
See also http://projects.oucs.ox.ac.uk/jtap/reports/digit/ for some
information about that camera.
Doesn't that camera tessalate (as opposed to the super-resolution that
the thread is about) ?
BugBear
I compared it to the FlexFrame 4040 you mentioned. And I thought both
systems claimed to use some sort of a microscanning technique. No,
scanning is not the right word: it was a grabber.
Right now I can't see the fundamental difference between such an in
camera system and a handheld technique that uses natural shaking. And
that's purely based on what I read about that "super resolution"
technique in the petapixel blog post mentioned earlier.
If the main purpose of "super resolution" was to step beyond the border
of diffraction this might be helpful for gigapixel photography, right?
Carl
--
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/hugin-ptx/54F6DBDB.5020407%40einem.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
