"Jeffrey R. Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can't argue with that, but I still want 'em ;-) I agree it's inconvenient > that there are sooo many distributions in unix-land. How 'bout if you rely on > civic-minded volunteers to build the packages for you? That sounds like a good idea to me. I certainly don't want Alastair to start making packages as part of the release if that would slow down the release cycle. :-) (Except for the annoying special case of Win32.) Carl Witty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number library) Carl R. Witty
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number libr... Alastair Reid
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number libr... Byron Cook
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number libr... Carl R. Witty
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number libr... Alastair Reid
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number libr... Jeffrey R. Lewis
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number libr... Alastair Reid
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number ... Simon Marlow
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number libr... Jeffrey R. Lewis
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number ... Carl R. Witty
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number libr... Erik Meijer
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number libr... Alastair Reid
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number libr... Carl R. Witty
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number ... Alastair Reid
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number libr... Byron Cook
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number libr... Carl R. Witty
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number ... Simon Marlow
