> I guess the main "warm fuzzy" feeling I get from packages is knowing > that the packaging system is tracking which files belong to which > packages, so that if I ever remove Hugs (not that I ever would!) or > upgrade it, I know that there aren't old files lying around. Aha! I knew there was a reason I started this thread. Yes, that's definitely a win! I avoid the worst of these upgrade-related problems by _always_ installing in my home dir if at all possible. Works great on a personal workstation but less good on shared machines. Alastair
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number library) Alastair Reid
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number library) Jeffrey R. Lewis
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number library) Alastair Reid
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number library) Jeffrey R. Lewis
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number libr... Carl R. Witty
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number library) Erik Meijer
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number library) Alastair Reid
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number library) Carl R. Witty
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number libr... Alastair Reid
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number library) Byron Cook
- Re: bug in Hugs 1.4 and 1.3c arithmetic (Number library) Carl R. Witty
