Hello,

the recent postings on this topic gave me the imression that some people 
understood my postings as having a negative opinion regarding the music styles 
of at the medieval fairs. That is not the case. I really sympathise with people 
who stand in for doing the "Creative Anachronism". There is allot of truth in 
it. 

Its just honest to say "yes, what we are doing is a fairy tale, yes we know 
this is for sure not how its known it was, yes its succsessfull entertainment". 

This also concerns the "early music concert" department. Also in this business 
there are many speculative elements and modernisms hidden from the audience. 

The differnce just is somehow between "we honestly care for the history" and 
"we honestly do not care" wherein honesty is the common ground. 

All I asked for is to be careful. We should just not forget that the audience 
cannot not know about this topic as much as the performers do. The audience 
does therefore not have (unlike the performers) the possibility to do an 
informed differentiation between historical truth and fairy tale. This gets us 
performers close to a position in which we are endangered to profit from 
someones naivity. In my *personal* catalog of fairness this is not the right 
way to go. 
I do not mean performers do this intenitionally, all I want to say is: be 
careful not to accidentally do this, by not being aware of the gap of knowledge 
between musicans and audience.

In german I would put it to "Wissen verpflichtet" maybe this can be translated 
as "knowledge oblige".

Kind regards,

Simon




-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "hurdygurdy" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/hurdygurdy

The rules of posting, courtesy, and other list information may be found at 
http://hurdygurdy.com/mailinglist/index.htm.  To reduce spam, posts from new 
subscribers are held pending approval by the webmaster.

Reply via email to