Krzysztof Foltman wrote: > Gabriel M. Beddingfield wrote: > >> BUT... on the TR808 kit (where we just fixed the clicking noise) -- this >> patch makes it very easy to bring the clicking noise back when editing >> the instrument. :-) > > I don't fully understand. Do you mean that with 100k it's too easy to > make the release stage too short (which causes clicking?) It will be > even shorter if you decrease the max time from 100k to 50k :)
Yes. This is what I mean. If you set the knob to 0, you git a click (which is expected). If you set the knob to "a little bit of red showing," you still get a click... which I don't think is expected. But, you're right... 50k should have made it worse. But... it seemed to get better for me. Did I fool myself? > Or maybe clamping release at "safe" time like 30msec would be a good > enough "low-tech" solution for 0.9.4? Hmmm... I think the users will sometimes want a 0-time release. > Some extra food for thought: the whole concept of "max envelope time (in > second) is dependent on sample's original sample rate" may case problems > in certain situations. Open hats and cymbals are sampled at 44.1k+, so > max decay time is short. Kicks and snares may be sampled at lower rates, > and yet they get twice the max decay time. Agreed. I intend to address these sorts of issues in the new transport. Another example.... "humanize" time is locked at 2000 frames. Should be in msecs. Peace, Gabriel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Hydrogen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hydrogen-devel
