Hi Adrian, As a co-author of the draft, my thoughts are as follows: * We need the standardization for the data model of monitoring interface. The monitoring interface plays a very important role of collecting NSF status, malicious events, etc, for the I2NSF architecture if done in a timely and comprehensive way; * the information model is necessary to explain which information are needed for monitoring interface, and why and how to design their classification, their attributes, etc. It's an important base and useful complement for the final data model.
B.R. Frank -----邮件原件----- 发件人: I2nsf [mailto:[email protected]] 代表 Adrian Farrel 发送时间: 2016年10月12日 5:22 收件人: [email protected] 主题: [I2nsf] Thoughts on draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring Working Group, Linda and I would like to hear some more from you about draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring. Is it something you think we should be working on? Should we have a separate YANG module for it or fold it into other modules? If we produce a YANG module, do we still need to publish the information model? And, most important, what do you think of the content of the draft? Thanks, Adrian _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
