Adrian: Why: Monitoring is a key component to I2NSF for monitoring NSF devices. Monitoring is not the same as NSF devices sending notifications - which is a push from the NSF devices. Monitoring may encompasses specific requests to the device. Monitoring is different than the DOTS - "help me" cry from a device under attack. While I see the security ADs are proposing Security event, it is important that the I2NSF create monitoring concepts that work with all of the functions (e.g. querying capabilities, sending/receiving notification, and events).
Data model versus Information model: Since we do not seem to have a clear idea of what the data model should be, it is important to create the informational models. The content of the draft is a good first step. Sue Hares -----Original Message----- From: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 5:22 PM To: i2nsf@ietf.org Subject: [I2nsf] Thoughts on draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring Working Group, Linda and I would like to hear some more from you about draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring. Is it something you think we should be working on? Should we have a separate YANG module for it or fold it into other modules? If we produce a YANG module, do we still need to publish the information model? And, most important, what do you think of the content of the draft? Thanks, Adrian _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list I2nsf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list I2nsf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
