Why: Monitoring is a key component to I2NSF for monitoring NSF devices.  
Monitoring is not the same as NSF devices sending notifications - which is a
push from the NSF devices.  Monitoring may encompasses specific requests to
the device.   Monitoring is different than the DOTS - "help me" cry from a
device under attack.
While I see the security ADs are proposing Security event, it is important
that the I2NSF create monitoring concepts that work with all of the
functions (e.g. querying capabilities, sending/receiving notification, and

Data model versus Information model:  Since we do not seem to have a clear
idea of what the data model should be, it is important to create the
informational models.  

The content of the draft is a good first step. 

Sue Hares 

-----Original Message-----
From: I2nsf [] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 5:22 PM
Subject: [I2nsf] Thoughts on draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring

Working Group,

Linda and I would like to hear some more from you about

Is it something you think we should be working on?
Should we have a separate YANG module for it or fold it into other modules?
If we produce a YANG module, do we still need to publish the information

And, most important, what do you think of the content of the draft?


I2nsf mailing list

I2nsf mailing list

Reply via email to