Hi WG chairs, Monitoring is a key piece of overall security framework. In order to build and maintain a dynamic and proactive security posture, it is very critical to monitor various activities and gather information from various sources. This information is used by security analytic engines to look for any warning signs missed by traditional security policies.
To simply state, monitoring is a key element of defense-in-depth security architecture. It must be a part of I2NSF working group, so that security applications can get the required information using I2NSF WG interfaces instead of relying on vendor/developer proprietary interfaces. Regards, Rakesh On 10/11/16, 2:21 PM, "I2nsf on behalf of Adrian Farrel" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: Working Group, Linda and I would like to hear some more from you about draft-zhang-i2nsf-info-model-monitoring. Is it something you think we should be working on? Should we have a separate YANG module for it or fold it into other modules? If we produce a YANG module, do we still need to publish the information model? And, most important, what do you think of the content of the draft? Thanks, Adrian _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf _______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
