Hi John, Thanks for your constructive suggestions on our draft. :-) We authors will clarify your suggestions on the next revision.
You can give us your advice on our next revision. Thanks. Best Regards, Paul On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 8:46 AM, John Strassner <straz...@gmail.com> wrote: > IMHO, the purpose of a WG adopting a draft is to acknowledge that the > draft is a good starting point for the work that WG wants to accomplish. To > be perfectly clear, I am NOT objecting on the completeness of the document. > Rather, I am objecting on the technical correctness of the starting point. > > I do NOT feel that the proposed documents represent a good starting point. > Ignoring things that can be easily fixed (e.g., grammar), there are a host > of problems, such as: > - what, exactly, is this draft trying to do? I thought I would see YANG > for policy rules sent over the Consumer-Facing Interface. > Instead, I see the name of the interface, whose first element is > multi-tenancy, that also contains policies? Policies do not care > about multi-tenancy. They do care about domains. The organization of > the YANG is incorrect. > - sec 4: in the ieft-i2nsf-cf-interface module > - why is multi-tenancy at the top of the tree? Shouldn't a DOMAIN > be able to have multiple tenants? > - why does a domain have an authentication-method? First, multiple > such methods should be able to be used. Second, how would a domain know > what an authentication method even is? > - why is tenant a sibling of domain, and not a child? > - why is domain a leaf within policy-tenant? This should be a > reference, and why doesn't domain have a reference to policy-tenant? > - policy roles have nothing to do with multi-tenancy - why are they > here? > > I could go on, but even the above means that the rest of the YANG will be > wrong. > > Therefore, the document is NOT a good starting point, and will NOT > accelerate the path to getting a good RFC. > > regards, > John > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 3:23 PM, Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@huawei.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> The authors of I2NSF Consumer-Facing Interface YANG Data Model >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jeong-i2nsf-consumer-facin >> g-interface-dm-04 >> >> >> >> Have requested working group adoption of this draft. >> >> >> >> Please bear in mind that WG Adoption doesn’t mean that the draft current >> content is ready, WG Adoption only means that it is a good basis for a >> working group to work on. >> >> >> >> While all feedback is helpful, comments pro or con with explanations are >> much more helpful than just "yes please" or "no thank you". >> >> >> >> Thank you. >> >> >> >> Linda & Yoav >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> I2nsf mailing list >> I2nsf@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf >> >> > > > -- > regards, > John > > _______________________________________________ > I2nsf mailing list > I2nsf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf > > -- =========================== Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Software Sungkyunkwan University Office: +82-31-299-4957 Email: jaehoon.p...@gmail.com, paulje...@skku.edu Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php <http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php>
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list I2nsf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
