I2nsf WG, There has been any objection to the Author’s request for sunsetting the draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-05.
Authors of the draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model: please remove the reference to the Capability Information Model and upload a new draft. We can ask IESG to re-review it. Thank you very much. Linda & Yoav. From: Linda Dunbar Sent: Monday, September 28, 2020 11:00 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Is there any objection of sunset the I2NSF Capabilities Information Model Draft and merge the relevant information to the I2NSF Capability Data model draft? I2NSF WG, As Diego has expressed that the original I2NSF capability information model was based on a policy expression calculus suitable for manipulating high-level policy expressions. The capability data model has been evolving in a quite reasonable and pragmatic way, including running code at the hackathons. The I2NSF Capability Information Model has fulfilled its purpose of kickstarting and guiding the data model, and the authors believe that it is better to let the capability information model to be withdrawn. For the content in the information model still relevant to I2NSF Capability Data Model, they should be merged into the Capability Data Model. Is there any objection from the WG? If we don’t hear any objection by Oct 5, we will change the status of the draft. Cheers, Linda & Yoav From: Diego R. Lopez <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 5:35 PM To: Linda Dunbar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Xialiang (Frank) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Yoav Nir <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; John Strassner <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Aldo Basile <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Roman Danyliw <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: Offer for Revision Help for I2NSF NSFs Capabilities Information Model Draft Hi Linda, I’d prefer the second option, as it seems more straightforward and natural to me, and in parallel would like you to consider the idea of an I2NSF extension allowing us to reuse the capability model for policy-control transformation, and to incorporate the attestation matters you know I was so much interested in. Be goode, -- "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno" Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica I+D https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr2lopez/<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fdr2lopez%2F&data=02%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C08a48858d7bd4d843a6e08d85f47b438%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637364108864949633&sdata=ROR4%2FyD1WqWDb1rCbJx3ERqTiMCQ92ibkyz26kYZdD8%3D&reserved=0> e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Tel: +34 913 129 041 Mobile: +34 682 051 091 ---------------------------------- On 22/09/2020, 18:01, "Linda Dunbar" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Diego: Thank you very much for the reflection of the Capabilities Information Model Draft. Agree with your statement that “the capability data model was evolving in a quite reasonable and pragmatic way, including running code at the hackathons”. Looks like Eric Vyncke still wants the information model to be fixed to clear his “DISCUSS” ballot. How about the following steps: - Ask Roman’s advice if we can simplify the Information Model mainly to reflect what has been in the Data Model. - Or, drop the Information model draft and remove the refence to the draft, but Roman has to convince Eric to agree not having the information model. What do you think? Linda From: Diego R. Lopez <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 9:50 AM To: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Linda Dunbar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Xialiang (Frank) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Yoav Nir <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; John Strassner <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Aldo Basile <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Roman Danyliw <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: Offer for Revision Help for I2NSF NSFs Capabilities Information Model Draft Hi Paul, Before you go for it, let me share with you some reflections on the state of the draft, in the spirit of what I replied to Eric Vyncke. I must confess there has been a combination of events that made me think the best solution was to leave this draft to fade away. First, I was not (have not been yet) able to find a solution to most of Roman’s comments without totally rewriting most, if not all, of the document. Second, the fact that the capability data model was evolving in a quite reasonable and pragmatic way, including running code at the hackathons, following the spirit of the initial work in the information model, but not attempting to align with its most recent evolution. If I have not shared this position before is because I have been looking for a way to make the idea of bridging capability declarations and security policy statements at the I2NSF controller viable, and I was hoping to find such a way by reusing part of the capability info model draft. As I told Eric, I believe the current capability model has a powerful (though probably not yet complete) calculus for policy description and validation, but not directly related to the management mechanisms addressed in the capability data model and the other data models produced in I2NSF. I believe there is an opportunity for accomplishing policy-capability bridging, using as foundation the current capability model, though it seems to me that this task would require some time to consolidate and therefore imply an extension of the I2NSF lifetime. I would like to know your position(*) about such an extension, that could also become an opportunity to work in other matters related to attestation (in the light of the work in RATS and the MUD initiative within the Ops Area) and accounting. Be goode, (*) I assume you are in favor, Paul. But I’d like to get Linda’s, Yoav’s and Roman’s ideas, as well as the availability to work on this from Frank, John and Aldo. -- "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno" Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica I+D https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr2lopez/<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fdr2lopez%2F&data=02%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C08a48858d7bd4d843a6e08d85f47b438%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637364108864949633&sdata=ROR4%2FyD1WqWDb1rCbJx3ERqTiMCQ92ibkyz26kYZdD8%3D&reserved=0> e-mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Tel: +34 913 129 041 Mobile: +34 682 051 091 ---------------------------------- On 17/09/2020, 01:42, "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Linda, I will address our AD Roman's comments on this NSFs capabilities information draft as the 2nd editor through the collaboration with Frank (the 1st editor) and the other authors. I CC our AD Roman and the other authors, such as John and Cataldo. Thanks for your support and guidance. Best Regards, Paul 2020년 9월 17일 (목) 오전 3:44, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>님이 작성: Paul, Thank you very much for offering to address the AD comments to this draft. Looks like the current authors are too busy to address those comments. It has been over a year since the AD comments were given. We need to move the draft forward. Therefore, I2NSF chairs have authorized you to be one of the editors to address the AD comments and revise the draft. Thank you very much. Linda & Yoav From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:09 AM To: Xialiang (Frank) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Linda Dunbar <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Yoav Nir <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Jaehoon Jeong <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Offer for Revision Help for I2NSF NSFs Capabilities Information Model Draft Hi Frank, Could I help you to revise your information model draft for our AD Roman Danyliw's review comments as a co-editor? https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability/?include_text=1<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-i2nsf-capability%2F%3Finclude_text%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C08a48858d7bd4d843a6e08d85f47b438%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637364108864959626&sdata=GUrbaYu2Q4N1YNUUet2oVRPqbynA78cSBTf%2FBeSCY44%3D&reserved=0> As you know, I have finished our I2NSF data model drafts. I am happy to work on the revision with you in order to complete our I2NSF deliverables. Thanks. Best Regards, Paul ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição ________________________________ Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción. The information contained in this transmission is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete it. Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
