Paul, Thank you very much for the update.
Linda On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 9:29 PM Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi Linda and Yoav, > I need more time to merge the information model and data model for > draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model along with the reflection of the > IESG's comments: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model/ > > I will try to do the merging and the reflection of the comments of the > IESG by IETF-109 I-D due (11/02/2020). > > Thanks. > > Best Regards, > Paul > > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 10:33 AM Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Linda, >> I see. >> >> I will do the merging. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Best Regards, >> Paul >> >> 2020년 10월 10일 (토) 오전 10:20, Linda <[email protected]>님이 작성: >> >>> Yes >>> Linda >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Oct 9, 2020, at 7:55 PM, Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi Linda, >>> As I understand, I need to merge the relevant contents of the NSFs >>> Capability Information Model Draft into the I2NSF NSF Capability Data Model >>> Draft. >>> >>> Is it correct? >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Paul >>> >>> 2020년 10월 9일 (금) 오후 11:58, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>님이 >>> 작성: >>> >>>> I2NSF WG, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Correction: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> There has been NO object to the Author’s request for sunsetting the >>>> draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-5. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We have marked the draft as “DEAD” in the WG status. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Many thanks to the authors for putting the effort in this draft for >>>> kickstarting all the data models in I2NSF WG. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Linda & Yoav >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Linda Dunbar >>>> *Sent:* Thursday, October 8, 2020 4:36 PM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-05 is officially removed from >>>> I2NSF WG ( was RE: Is there any objection of sunset the I2NSF Capabilities >>>> Information Model Draft and merge the relevant information to the I2NSF >>>> Capability Data model draft? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I2nsf WG, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> There has been any objection to the Author’s request for sunsetting the >>>> draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-05. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Authors of the draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model: please remove >>>> the reference to the Capability Information Model and upload a new draft. >>>> We can ask IESG to re-review it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you very much. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Linda & Yoav. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Linda Dunbar >>>> *Sent:* Monday, September 28, 2020 11:00 AM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Is there any objection of sunset the I2NSF Capabilities >>>> Information Model Draft and merge the relevant information to the I2NSF >>>> Capability Data model draft? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I2NSF WG, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> As Diego has expressed that the original I2NSF capability information >>>> model was based on a policy expression calculus suitable for manipulating >>>> high-level policy expressions. The capability data model has been evolving >>>> in a quite reasonable and pragmatic way, including running code at the >>>> hackathons. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The I2NSF Capability Information Model has fulfilled its purpose of >>>> kickstarting and guiding the data model, and the authors believe that it is >>>> better to let the capability information model to be withdrawn. For the >>>> content in the information model still relevant to I2NSF Capability Data >>>> Model, they should be merged into the Capability Data Model. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Is there any objection from the WG? If we don’t hear any objection by >>>> Oct 5, we will change the status of the draft. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Linda & Yoav >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Diego R. Lopez <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2020 5:35 PM >>>> *To:* Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>; Mr. Jaehoon Paul >>>> Jeong <[email protected]> >>>> *Cc:* Xialiang (Frank) <[email protected]>; Yoav Nir < >>>> [email protected]>; John Strassner <[email protected]>; >>>> Aldo Basile <[email protected]>; Roman Danyliw <[email protected]> >>>> *Subject:* Re: Offer for Revision Help for I2NSF NSFs Capabilities >>>> Information Model Draft >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Linda, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I’d prefer the second option, as it seems more straightforward and >>>> natural to me, and in parallel would like you to consider the idea of an >>>> I2NSF extension allowing us to reuse the capability model for >>>> policy-control transformation, and to incorporate the attestation matters >>>> you know I was so much interested in. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Be goode, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Dr Diego R. Lopez >>>> >>>> Telefonica I+D >>>> >>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr2lopez/ >>>> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fdr2lopez%2F&data=02%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C08a48858d7bd4d843a6e08d85f47b438%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637364108864949633&sdata=ROR4%2FyD1WqWDb1rCbJx3ERqTiMCQ92ibkyz26kYZdD8%3D&reserved=0> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> Tel: +34 913 129 041 >>>> >>>> Mobile: +34 682 051 091 >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 22/09/2020, 18:01, "Linda Dunbar" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Diego: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you very much for the reflection of the Capabilities Information >>>> Model Draft. Agree with your statement that “the capability data model was >>>> evolving in a quite reasonable and pragmatic way, including running code at >>>> the hackathons”. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Looks like Eric Vyncke still wants the information model to be fixed to >>>> clear his “DISCUSS” ballot. >>>> >>>> How about the following steps: >>>> >>>> - Ask Roman’s advice if we can simplify the Information Model >>>> mainly to reflect what has been in the Data Model. >>>> >>>> - Or, drop the Information model draft and remove the refence >>>> to the draft, but Roman has to convince Eric to agree not having the >>>> information model. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> What do you think? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Linda >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Diego R. Lopez <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2020 9:50 AM >>>> *To:* Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]>; Linda Dunbar < >>>> [email protected]> >>>> *Cc:* Xialiang (Frank) <[email protected]>; Yoav Nir < >>>> [email protected]>; John Strassner <[email protected]>; >>>> Aldo Basile <[email protected]>; Roman Danyliw <[email protected]> >>>> *Subject:* Re: Offer for Revision Help for I2NSF NSFs Capabilities >>>> Information Model Draft >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Paul, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Before you go for it, let me share with you some reflections on the >>>> state of the draft, in the spirit of what I replied to Eric Vyncke. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I must confess there has been a combination of events that made me >>>> think the best solution was to leave this draft to fade away. First, I was >>>> not (have not been yet) able to find a solution to most of Roman’s comments >>>> without totally rewriting most, if not all, of the document. Second, the >>>> fact that the capability data model was evolving in a quite reasonable and >>>> pragmatic way, including running code at the hackathons, following the >>>> spirit of the initial work in the information model, but not attempting to >>>> align with its most recent evolution. If I have not shared this position >>>> before is because I have been looking for a way to make the idea of >>>> bridging capability declarations and security policy statements at the >>>> I2NSF controller viable, and I was hoping to find such a way by reusing >>>> part of the capability info model draft. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> As I told Eric, I believe the current capability model has a powerful >>>> (though probably not yet complete) calculus for policy description and >>>> validation, but not directly related to the management mechanisms addressed >>>> in the capability data model and the other data models produced in I2NSF. I >>>> believe there is an opportunity for accomplishing policy-capability >>>> bridging, using as foundation the current capability model, though it seems >>>> to me that this task would require some time to consolidate and therefore >>>> imply an extension of the I2NSF lifetime. I would like to know your >>>> position(*) about such an extension, that could also become an opportunity >>>> to work in other matters related to attestation (in the light of the work >>>> in RATS and the MUD initiative within the Ops Area) and accounting. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Be goode, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> (*) I assume you are in favor, Paul. But I’d like to get Linda’s, >>>> Yoav’s and Roman’s ideas, as well as the availability to work on this from >>>> Frank, John and Aldo. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno" >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Dr Diego R. Lopez >>>> >>>> Telefonica I+D >>>> >>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr2lopez/ >>>> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fdr2lopez%2F&data=02%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C08a48858d7bd4d843a6e08d85f47b438%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637364108864949633&sdata=ROR4%2FyD1WqWDb1rCbJx3ERqTiMCQ92ibkyz26kYZdD8%3D&reserved=0> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> Tel: +34 913 129 041 >>>> >>>> Mobile: +34 682 051 091 >>>> >>>> ---------------------------------- >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 17/09/2020, 01:42, "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Linda, >>>> >>>> I will address our AD Roman's comments on this NSFs capabilities >>>> information draft as the 2nd editor through the collaboration with Frank >>>> (the 1st editor) and the other authors. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I CC our AD Roman and the other authors, such as John and Cataldo. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for your support and guidance. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2020년 9월 17일 (목) 오전 3:44, Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>님이 >>>> 작성: >>>> >>>> Paul, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you very much for offering to address the AD comments to this >>>> draft. Looks like the current authors are too busy to address those >>>> comments. It has been over a year since the AD comments were given. We >>>> need to move the draft forward. Therefore, I2NSF chairs have authorized you >>>> to be one of the editors to address the AD comments and revise the draft. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thank you very much. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Linda & Yoav >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong <[email protected]> >>>> *Sent:* Sunday, September 13, 2020 10:09 AM >>>> *To:* Xialiang (Frank) <[email protected]> >>>> *Cc:* Linda Dunbar <[email protected]>; Yoav Nir < >>>> [email protected]>; DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <[email protected]>; >>>> Jaehoon Jeong <[email protected]> >>>> *Subject:* Offer for Revision Help for I2NSF NSFs Capabilities >>>> Information Model Draft >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Frank, >>>> >>>> Could I help you to revise your information model draft for our AD >>>> Roman Danyliw's review comments as a co-editor? >>>> >>>> >>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability/?include_text=1 >>>> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-i2nsf-capability%2F%3Finclude_text%3D1&data=02%7C01%7Clinda.dunbar%40futurewei.com%7C08a48858d7bd4d843a6e08d85f47b438%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C637364108864959626&sdata=GUrbaYu2Q4N1YNUUet2oVRPqbynA78cSBTf%2FBeSCY44%3D&reserved=0> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> As you know, I have finished our I2NSF data model drafts. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I am happy to work on the revision with you in order to complete our >>>> I2NSF deliverables. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su >>>> destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es >>>> para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el >>>> destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, >>>> divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de >>>> la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos >>>> que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su >>>> destrucción. >>>> >>>> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and >>>> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or >>>> entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended >>>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >>>> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received >>>> this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the >>>> sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete >>>> it. >>>> >>>> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu >>>> destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para >>>> uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o >>>> destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, >>>> divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da >>>> legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos >>>> o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> >>>> >>>> Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su >>>> destinatario, puede contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es >>>> para uso exclusivo de la persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el >>>> destinatario indicado, queda notificado de que la lectura, utilización, >>>> divulgación y/o copia sin autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de >>>> la legislación vigente. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos >>>> que nos lo comunique inmediatamente por esta misma vía y proceda a su >>>> destrucción. >>>> >>>> The information contained in this transmission is privileged and >>>> confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or >>>> entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended >>>> recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or >>>> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received >>>> this transmission in error, do not read it. Please immediately reply to the >>>> sender that you have received this communication in error and then delete >>>> it. >>>> >>>> Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu >>>> destinatário, pode conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para >>>> uso exclusivo da pessoa ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o >>>> destinatário indicado, fica notificado de que a leitura, utilização, >>>> divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização pode estar proibida em virtude da >>>> legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos >>>> o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e proceda a sua destruição >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> I2nsf mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> I2nsf mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf >>> >>> >
_______________________________________________ I2nsf mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2nsf
