I was just thinking that UML might be good to show the interrelationships, if those get complex. I'll take a look at RFC 6728.
Alia On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2013, at 5:26 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:13:44AM -0500, Alia Atlas wrote: > >> Juergen, > >> > >> What would you recommend for an information model for i2rs? > >> > > > > Frankly, I do not know. I am still unsure what the scope/complexity of > > i2rs really is. To find out, I guess people just have to pick > > something and get started. YANG tree diagrams are fine to get a quick > > overview of YANG data models, they likely won't be the right tool if > > many of data model items with more complex interrelationships are > > involved - then you need additional diagrams. > > I like the approach of RFC 6728 which combines UML with YANG. > > Lada > > > > > /js > > > > -- > > Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany > > Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> > > _______________________________________________ > > i2rs mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs > > -- > Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs > PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C > > > > >
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
