On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:36 AM, Ladislav Lhotka <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Jan 24, 2013, at 5:26 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:13:44AM -0500, Alia Atlas wrote: > >> Juergen, > >> > >> What would you recommend for an information model for i2rs? > >> > > > > Frankly, I do not know. I am still unsure what the scope/complexity of > > i2rs really is. To find out, I guess people just have to pick > > something and get started. YANG tree diagrams are fine to get a quick > > overview of YANG data models, they likely won't be the right tool if > > many of data model items with more complex interrelationships are > > involved - then you need additional diagrams. > > I like the approach of RFC 6728 which combines UML with YANG. > > How about both?. The first step is to understand the data structures at a high level and how they relate to each other. The IPFIX approach is best for that. The next step is understanding each data structure in more detail and YANG tree diagrams are good for that. I agree with Tom that the syntax is not completely intuitive. > Lada > > Andy
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
