Hi, I've a question about i2rs multi-headed control and NETCONF.
[draft-ietf-i2rs-problem-statement-00] describes:"Additional extensions to handle multi-headed control may need to be added to NetConf and/or appropriate data models." [draft-ietf-i2rs-architecture-00] describes:"The current recommendation is to have a simple priority associated with each I2RS clients, and the highest priority change remains in effect." As NETCONF has <lock> mechanism: "The <lock> operation allows the client to lock the entire configuration data-store system of a device. Such locks are intended to be short-lived and allow a client to make a change without fear of interaction with other NETCONF clients, non-NETCONF clients (e.g., SNMP and CLI), and human users." Do we still need to do the extensions, i.e. additional extensions to handle multi-headed control added to NETCONF? Regards, Ran _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
