Hi Benoit, Yes, as is clearly articulated in the draft,it is a generic topology into which all other topology-related work should plug.
I2RS and Alex are very happy to hear comments and reviews of that draft. Regards, Alia On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Benoit Claise <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Alia, > > I would need your guidance. On my side, I'm trying to help the SUPA people > with the scope of their work. > > During a SUPA call during which Sue explained the I2RS work (thanks again > Sue), she answered a key question: any topology work should be based on the > I2RS topology draft (draft-clemm-i2rs-yang-network-topo draft). This draft > was called the generic topology model draft. > > Discussing further with the SUPA BoF chairs, it was observed that the I2RS > charter doesn't mention it's a generic topology model. So please let us > know what your intention is. Is this L3 topology a generic one, into which > all others topology-related work should plug? > > The SUPA requirement is a way to express topology at several layers of > abstraction (granularity). > > Regards, Benoit > > >
_______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
