On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 08:07:13PM -0500, Susan Hares wrote: > Juergen: > > As our technical advisor, thank you for providing input on our charter > versus our area of work. > > This individual draft AD has been marked as a candidate for WG Adoption. > The plan for the Topology Design team work has been on the I2RS Wiki for 2 > months. We discussed this approach at the December I2RS meeting on > 12/16/2014 when we reviewed topologies. As our Technical advisor, I would > appreciate if you let Jeff and I know earlier if you think we are in > violation of charter with our work. I could have addressed it with Alia in > early January. >
I asked that the charter is updated to reflect what the I2RS is working on. The word 'violation' is yours. I have asked several times that the IESG members involved should work out where generic topology work is done. If the conclusion is I2RS, fine. All I ask is that this is properly reflected in a charter update. This is in particular true since topology comes up in various corners and not everybody may be able to figure out which individual I-D defines what I2RS is tasked to work on. Don't get angry at me, I suggest to prepare a charter update instead. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ i2rs mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
