Thank you Alia.
Regards, Benoit
Hi Benoit,
Yes, as is clearly articulated in the draft,it is a generic topology
into which all other topology-related work should
plug.
I2RS and Alex are very happy to hear comments and reviews of that draft.
Regards,
Alia
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Benoit Claise <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Dear Alia,
I would need your guidance. On my side, I'm trying to help the
SUPA people with the scope of their work.
During a SUPA call during which Sue explained the I2RS work
(thanks again Sue), she answered a key question: any topology work
should be based on the I2RS topology draft
(draft-clemm-i2rs-yang-network-topo draft). This draft was called
the generic topology model draft.
Discussing further with the SUPA BoF chairs, it was observed that
the I2RS charter doesn't mention it's a generic topology model. So
please let us know what your intention is. Is this L3 topology a
generic one, into which all others topology-related work should plug?
The SUPA requirement is a way to express topology at several
layers of abstraction (granularity).
Regards, Benoit
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
