On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 08:01:35PM -0500, Alia Atlas wrote:
>
> Those interested in SUPA were told very clearly before last IETF that
> the topology work was already being addressed in I2RS. You haven't
> chosen to participate in progressing the actual work.
>
Some people do read charters to determine what WGs are supposed to do.
If charters get out of sync, then this leads to mis-understandings. I
think it is not fair to blame those who read outdated charters.
/js
PS: I actively tried to bring SUPA folks to I2RS interims where
topology was on the agenda but then the agenda got changed. This
is fine, the WG chairs can choose to set priorities. But then
having to read "you haven't chosen to participate in progressing
the actual work" makes me feel somewhat unhappy given that there
is a design team and attempts to figure out what is going on in
the past did not work out.
--
Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
_______________________________________________
i2rs mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i2rs
