At Sat, 8 Nov 2008 01:32:49 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > >Part of the honest worry about these issues comes from very good > >reasons not to just trust everyone. But it also seems that e.g. Debian > >needs to widen its circle of trust to include experts in wider > >varieties of programming. There are plenty of trustworthy Smalltalkers > >and Squeakers, and there is absolutely no reason that some should not > >be on call to deal with perceived problems. > > If you mean that Debian ought to trust upstream to fix bugs and take > care of security issues _instead_ of its own package maintainers, then I > disagree: I believe *both* upstream and the distribution-specific > routines should be applied in parallel.
I think he just means that Etoys is no different from others. Etoys is just happened to be written in a different language and there are people who understands or can learn the language; none of what you wrote in this email suggests Etoys needs to be treated differently. -- Yoshiki _______________________________________________ IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!) [email protected] http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
