Hi, Laura
The simplest answer is that is a part of the job of the TCM not the Board.
Tony
On 04/06/2016 11:39 PM, Laura Vargas wrote:
Tony,
What would be in place to explain, is why atfer the creation of the
position (first motion) SLOBs are not openly requiring proposals from
all community members and /or any interested party that might be
adequate or experienced to execute the required functions.
In my opinion public email in IAEP + localization list + 15 -30 days
to get proposals, should be enough to be called an "open call".
Best regards,
Laura
2016-04-06 22:44 GMT+08:00 Walter Bender <walter.ben...@gmail.com
<mailto:walter.ben...@gmail.com>>:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Dave Crossland <d...@lab6.com
<mailto:d...@lab6.com>> wrote:
On 6 April 2016 at 09:42, Walter Bender
<walter.ben...@gmail.com <mailto:walter.ben...@gmail.com>> wrote:
the traffic on the list is close to nil
Does the traffic include deliberation of motions? :)
Never intentionally. When it does happen, we try to catch the
mistake, such as Adam reminding Tony to circulate his motion publicly,
Also, in answer to an earlier question, yes, the ombudsman is a
member of the list.
-walter
-walter
-walter
--
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org
_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org <mailto:IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org>
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
--
Laura V.
I&D SomosAZUCAR.Org
Identi.ca/Skype acaire
IRC kaametza
Happy Learning!
_______________________________________________
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
IAEP@lists.sugarlabs.org
http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
