I started installing CA11 V3. It really seemed complicated to have to install Datacom to be able to run CA11. We already had Datacom installed, but at an old release level. By the time I got everything ready, they announced our datacenter was closing, so I couldn't install anything new anyway. That's one way to get rid of CA products.

Eric Bielefeld
P&H Mining Equipment

Robert Justice wrote:
unfortunately, we are getting ready to move it into production in a 25,000+ mips environment. .
Certainly I have seen issues where you have to issue a RESET command because the file doesn't get closed properly during an unscheduled outage. When I was first playing with it, I had to re-create all of the datasets for the product because it was getting DB* errors and reset, etc. wasn't working.


Why C/A decided to make people be a DBA just to run a scheduling restart manager is beyond me.

I keep hoping the CA11 replacement proposal at our shop gets off the ground shortly.

I have yet to talk to anyone that thinks CA-11 under DATACOM is a good idea (well, except for C/A people of course).

I certainly understand your hesitation, we're only considering moving to CA11 V3 because V2 is unsupported. I keep hoping C/A will realize what a mistake this is and come out with a release of CA11 (or a ptf for such) that doesn't require datacom

---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to