As I read that article, the problem was not the mainframe, it was that the data center and all the programmers were controlled by another state agency. The courts had to pay the prices dictated by that agency for computer access and programming services, and had to bid to get their projects and enhancements put on the programming schedule.

The latter is often a problem in companies with a centralized programming dept. It certainly was at the last end-user company I worked for (who shall remain nameless).

The courts brought the processing and programming in-house. She says she saved $500K but also says she had to hire her own programers; I wonder if those costs were included. They kept the old COBOL programs, just reworked to run on Windows, so they presumably have COBOL progammers on her staff to maintain them, as well as other programmers for the new apps.

They probably could have brought all of that inhouse on a small IBM zSeries, no conversion, doing the new apps under USS or Linux or maybe keeping them on CICS. From everything I read, the cost may well have been less.

--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.innovationdp.fdr.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to