I am about to do the same. However, don't expect too much of a performance improvement, just a reduction in the amount of space needed for each record.
Steve -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tim Hare Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 2:04 PM To: [email protected] Subject: CA-1: blocked TMC / Audit? I'm getting around to the CA-1 5.2 => 11 migration. We've always run with the TMC unblocked (worked for us, "ain't broke don't fix it", etc.) but blocking it would help with the run time of some utilities and reports, probably. Is anyone using CA-1 with a blocked TMC? Were there any snags or issues to look out for? We use a separate TMC for our test LPAR, so I can "experiment" if necessary, but I thought I'd ask the experienced crew here before going down that path. Thanks, Tim Hare Senior Systems Programmer Florida Department of Transportation (850) 414-4209 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.csfb.com/legal_terms/disclaimer_external_email.shtml ============================================================================== ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
