On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:03:31 -0400, Tim Hare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm getting around to the CA-1 5.2 => 11 migration. We've always run with >the TMC unblocked (worked for us, "ain't broke don't fix it", etc.) but >blocking it would help with the run time of some utilities and reports, >probably. Is anyone using CA-1 with a blocked TMC? Were there any snags or >issues to look out for? > The only one *I* can think of was a storage abend problem with STK EXLM which had DCB=BUFNO=255 coded. I did report the issue and since then STK updated their sample JCL with a note to remove the specification if your TMS has blocked records. I know I've seen CA samples that had the same thing coded. We probably have some running but since they didn't abend they are probably still running that way. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Systems Programming expert at http://Search390.com/ateExperts/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
