Whether he is implying it or not, I am. Jon
<snip> on >>a platform whose strong suit is reliability and maintainability, having to >>issue a command usually reserved for terminating problematical programs to >>bring down the system "normally" is an exposure. How do you explain to an >>operator that some things can and should be ended via CANCEL, while others >>need STOP and using CANCEL on them is a bad thing, while still others will >>just plain reject a CANCEL? I hope you're not implying IBM should invest resources to clean up APPC. </snip> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
