In <[email protected]>, on 10/29/2010
at 05:35 AM, willie bunter <[email protected]> said:
>Would anybody know what would be causing this?
My first guess would be that there's an alias involved. What are the
current definitions for ES1.CMN2.SYSDUMP, ES1.CMN2.SYSDUMP.G3430V00,
SYS2.CMN2.SYSDUMP0 and SYS2.CMN2.SYSDUMP.G3430V00?
>Is it because of the RECFM?
I don't see how? OTOH, there is no RECFM=0; without valid DCB
parameters I would expect anything but a physical copy to fail.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
