In <[email protected]>, on 10/29/2010
at 05:51 AM, willie bunter <[email protected]> said:
>Did you have a task running (batch, tso or Online) that was using the
>BASE GDG?
That still leaves the question of why the message had
ES1.CMN2.SYSDUMP.G3430V00 instead of SYS2.CMN2.SYSDUMP
or SYS2.CMN2.SYSDUMP.G3430V00.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
