In a recent note, Bob Rutledge said: > Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:39:42 -0500 > > > ... is it possible "AQ64238" is a typo for "PQ64238"? > > No. AQ64238 would be an APAR fix issued prior to the PTF fixing PQ64238. > (Multiple such would be BQ..., etc.) UQ6888x will SUP AQ64238 plus any other > APAR fixes, thus satisfying the HOLD. SMP/E has no knowledge of "PQ64238". > Thanks. I misled myself by performing an IBMLINK search for "AQ64238" and finding nothing.
I understand, of course, that even if no APAR fix AQ64238 is ever issued, the UQ6888x by SUPerseding AQ64238 will resolve the HOLD. Nonetheless, since "AQ64238" is known to SMP/E and manifest to the customer, wouldn't it be a courtesy to casual and naive (such as me) browsers, to make "AQ64238" known in IBMlink, perhaps as a keyword for PQ64238? -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
