I believe that you are incorrect. We had one system in our sysplex have a JES2 running as JESR for several years. No problems at all.
Mark Jacobs Time Customer Service Inc. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Arnett Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:04 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Define and start JES2 Short answer is that the primary subsystem (for JES2) must be named JES2 and the procedure must have the same name. Johnny Luo wrote: >New to mainframe..so the question maybe look a little silly. > >Here is what IEFSSN00 of our site defines JES2: > >SUBSYS SUBNAME(JES2) /* JES2 AS PRIMARY SUBSYSTEM */ > PRIMARY(YES) START(NO) > >My question is concerning parmameter SUBNAME: > >Is it true that it must be the same name as JES2 procedure? >Take the above IEFSSN00 for example,do I need to name the >JES2 procedure 'JES2' also?Or I can use another name for it,say, >JESA？ > > > > >-- >Best Regards, >Johnny Luo > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, >send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO >Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
