Gee I wonder, hypothetically: if all companies did allow teleworking for sysprogs, would there be a shortage, or excess for that matter? Tele-freedom would certainly smooth out the geographic supply/demand imbalance (and I'm speculating that imbalance does exist, without knowing).
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2006 8:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Systems Programmer Levels Justification In <[EMAIL PROTECTED] xar.org>, on 03/29/2006 at 06:27 PM, Desi de la Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Thanks to everyone. Now if we only could find a SysProg........... Well, if you allowed telecommuting, ... -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ------------------------------------------------------- --------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
