In a recent note, john gilmore said: > Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:19:23 +0000 > > When I do I also use a pair of CONTROL statements. the first to increase the > number of log buffers (I double them) and the second to restore the status > quo ante. > If two such processes could execute concurrently, the number of buffers could be left in an unpredictable final state. Is there a lock to prevent this? I suppose it could be as simple as incrementing and decrementing the buffer count with a Compare and Swap.
-- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
