On Wednesday 19 April 2006 10:47, Neal Eckhardt wrote: > .... IBM's official line (as interpreted by me) is that they'd rather > not substitute at all than have half or more jobs having the "wrong" > substitution (and half or more of the people complaining about it). > > Yea, but it's us non-sysplex single system people who have to suffer
Agreed. IBM should *not* make the unilateral decision that its users (either single-image or multi-image) can't use system symbolics in their JCL. The users themselves should be able to decide via a PARMLIB option and suffer the consequences if they screw up. -- Gilbert Saint-Flour GSF Software http://gsf-soft.com/Products/CCSS.shtml mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
