>I have never heard from my IBM or EMC guys about issues with the 146GB drives.
>It was always the 300GB drives that had too much latency for High-Volume >Online Transaction. >Other than that the 73 and 146 can coexist fine in your array. Y'NO! This argument has been going on since 3380-D/E/K days. I remember the first time I put paging on 3350's. The senior capacity analyst claimed I was 'wasting' space. It's our out-sourcer who's making the bad performance claim. (Now they don't want to put in FICON switches). . -teD Marching to the beat of a different flute ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
