In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/14/2006
at 04:32 AM, David Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I'm sorry, Shmuel, but your assertion, "No it doesn't" is a bit like
>asserting that two plus two does not equal four.
No, it's stationg the blunt facts.
>I think I've explained quite adequately in my prior posts why my
>above statement is true.
No, you've explained the *other* things that you do that cause the
problem. The fact that others have been shipping cumulative service
for decades without requiring a restore is enough to demonstrate that
the claim is nonsense. The cause is not cumulative service but your
use of zaps for the service.
>So I don't think you're speaking here from personal experience.
So, by the same token, the endorsements I've given over the decades
should also not be taken seriously. IAC, I was speaking from previous
experience; experience with SMP.
>BTW: What is it you're trying to say when you say, "It's not my
>dog"?
It means that I'm not the one left holding the bag when the balloon
goes up. But I had expected better of you.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
