In response to Ed's > -----Original Message----- > That will round out each CSECT to a 4K multiple. Suppose you want to > link two or more CSECTs together and have the resultant *module* rounded > to a 4K boundary?
Sam replied > Good point. Is this something that should be raised against the Binder > as a requirement for load modules? It doesn't seem like anyone who > wants to do this should have to use anything besides IBM HLASM and > Binder to accomplish it. Is there a way to do that today? Good luck! I know you've heard me bitch about it before, but it is still true that most of the contents of the binder manual are a work of modern fiction. And if you ask for it to be fixed (as I've done many times over the last few years) you're more likely to get a doc apar than an actual fix. The last I heard on this was that poor John Kapernick had been passed the smoldering potato. Haven't heard anything definite in over a year, but I did see him bopping through the cafeteria in Poughkeepsie a couple of weeks ago so at least he's still around. The "word on the street" seems to be that they will yank the fantasy chapters from the book rather than risk actually making it work - which would be a lot of work in any case. In theory you can get text sections in a PM3 program object aligned on powers of 2 boundaries, as long as the only powers you wanted were 3 and 12... and while the PACK/NOPACK options seem to offer more or less what you want, in reality you'll get "PACK" and be thankful for it. But as usual, I digress. Oh you wanted that in a LOAD MODULE???!!!! (Queue sounds of hollow laughter and manic giggling emanating from the wilds of Dutchess County) Dream on bud. CC ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
