Charles Mills wrote:
Without knowing what your day-to-day role is, it's hard to say.

First, simply by not being in denial. Mainframes are not better because the 
*snip*
OK ... I don't think that applies to me ... I'm not in denial ...
If you work for an end-user company, then you have some influence on, for
example, the ease-of-use of your systems. I often hear on this list a
*snip*
personnel only." Changing those attitudes would be a good step.
That's not an issue either. For the first 10 years that I worked on MVS I was in end-user support. My job was to make things easier for our customers. Since moving to Systems 15 years ago, I've made heavy use of the CBT tape and whatever sources I can find to do things to make life easier for my customers.
And some things cannot be changed. Better to work to advocate intelligently
for the use of mainframes for the tasks they are good at, than to operate in
denial of the fact that it's not the best choice for every computing task,
or every company.
OK. So what are they good at? I always thought they were "top dog" at transaction processing and database management. But recent discussions on this list indicate that that is no longer the case. I know I wouldn't push them in a compute intensive environment -- for that kind of workload we advocate IBM SP2s (at our sister site the Maui High Performance Computing Center) or Linux grids for people who can't get time on Maui's system. I also wouldn't advocate using them for desktop functions ... we advocate WIntel and Macs for that. Our computer science courses are taught on Intel boxes. I once advocated using z/VM+Linux and virtual networks to teach network and systems management concepts but I've been told that VMware on Intel is superior. I dunno, I use VMware workstation and I still think z/VM would work better for something like that but experts claim otherwise ... often citing that workstation is not the same as those ESX or GSX or whatever it is servers.

We traditionally ran all of our administrative workload (financials, human resources, student information system, etc.) in 3 LPARs on our single z/OS z890-220 mainframe. We've since migrated all but our financials to about 120 Sun servers of various sizes. Our financials are scheduled to complete migration by 2008. I've tried arguing that the mainframe must be more cost effective since it takes two systems programmers to run our mainframe (yes, the two of us wear all systems management hats from installing z/OS to maintaining our ADABAS/Natural envrionment) but it takes 9 sysadmins and 10 DBAs to run our Sun/Oracle environment. It also is a single box versus 120 rack-mounted boxes. We also had to have two new transformers installed to bring more power into our building to support the 120 boxes. We've also had to beef up our air conditioning system to keep our computer room cool. But my management claims that our Sun server farm is still more cost-effective. Don't ask me how. I still don't understand. But that's what I've been told so that's what I have to go with.

So, it's already been determined on this list that the "squatty boxes" are faster, cheaper, better, etc. than zSeries ... so how do we advocate intelligently for the use of mainframes? What exactly does the mainframe do better? What niche does it fit in? When and under what conditions does it make sense to use a mainframe?

Don't get me wrong: I love working on my z/OS system. I've worked with UNIX, Tops-20, VMS, Ultrix, Mumps, HP/MPE, VM/CMS, SunOS/Solaris,, and lately Linux. But I still like writing code on z/OS. But lately, what I've been hearing ON THIS LIST is that the mainframe really isn't "best of breed" or "king of the hill" in ANY arena. What I'm hearing ON THIS LIST is that z/OS is basically irrelevant except for running legacy code. So how does one advocate intelligently for its use? I mean, if Sun+Oracle is better, cheaper, faster, etc. than z/OS+CICS+ADABAS/Natural why should I be pushing for z/OS?

--Stephen

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to