I am a "just starting to turn gray" mainframer. I've still got about 20 years 
before retirement, so I'm thinking "WalMart Greeter" might enter my career 
path before it's all done.


==I'm interested in what you're seeing -- in industry, schools, user
==groups, etc. -- regarding new generations of mainframers.

I'm observing more mainframe education in colleges because IBM has decided 
to get back into that. I read a little about that on the IBM website a couple 
months ago, but not much in my area and I haven't the time right now. The 
last time I looked, one of the nearby universities was offering a COBOL class. 
I 
already know all I care to know about COBOL. Now assembler would be a 
different story. It's a tough situation when you let a good thing go. Trying to 
restart it doesn't happen over night.

==Does your employer court/train young professionals for mainframe careers?

Not anymore. But there's nothing wrong with taking the initiative and 
responsibility to train yourself.

==Do you work with younger colleagues? Is there a generation gap or is
==there "solidarity within mainframes"?

No. We operate with a small crew and aren't looking to increase staff at this 
time. Strangely, we're all about mid-career. I wonder how that happened ???

==Do you have younger relatives working on mainframes? If so, did you
==influence their career choices?

No.

==Do user groups adequately educate new folks in this technology and culture?

Yes, if you can get to the user groups and find one that's relevant. I hear 
SHARE is a great learning event, but expensive without subsidy. The only local 
user groups I'm aware of are for software products. Not mainframe specific 
and not z/OS.

==Are your mainframe areas of interest reflected in industry/educational
==initiatives?

Yes. But it's informal and self-initiated. I read a lot about where the 
platform is 
headed and would like to try a lot of these new things, but I have a job to do 
and can't responsibly divert the time necessary to fully evaluate new 
functionality. I'm a couple years behind, but it's my personal initiative that 
drives it, not a business need, so that's OK. So much to learn and so little 
time...

==If YOU are a non-graying mainframer -- what led to this career path? How
==do you like it so far? What future options do you see for yourself?

I think I'm pretty much middle of the pack. I'm one of the few who will be the 
bridge from the crotchety old farts to the thumb-sucking when-all-else-fails: 
reboot crowd. The future is bright regardless of the press reports. As 
environmentalists gain steam, virtualization will become necessary to reduce 
watts/sq ft. Being able to serve all manner of applications up from one 
machine with relatively low power requirements is a pretty impressive feat. If 
a 
few airline magazines would pick up on that, things would start happening in a 
hurry.

==Anything else?

Lots. IBM let their education involvement lapse and now they (or we) are 
paying for it. But look at how they decide to address it... A couple 
universities 
around the country and if you don't happen to live near one, you're SOL. If 
they were serious, they'd open up a lot of their web-based training for free. 
Or 
at least price it reasonably. $1000 for a CBT ??? I'll read manuals and hang 
out 
on the list servers and ask questions instead. A lot more cost effective for me.

Microsoft has the edge in this because the hardware and software is available 
everywhere for a reasonable price. IBM could support a PC based z/OS 
emulation environment for cheap and address that availability issue, but look 
at what they're doing with PSI right now and the threats they've always 
directed towards the Hercules project. IBM is not serious about reviving the 
platform or taking it to a higher level. I get the impression that they want it 
to 
be THE high-end computing platform. The problem is you HAVE to have people 
to run it. Educational support and availability of computing resources for 
learning are NECESSARY. It could be that IBM Global Services is expecting to 
take over administration on all these servers, but where do they get their 
training ??? IBM is party to generating the shortage of mainframe professionals 
if there is one.

As in all industries, leadership is a problem. This platform is tightly 
controlled 
by IBM. Where it goes and how fast it gets there is pretty much dictated by 
IBM. IBM has chosen to change directions lately and they're making slow 
progress.

Another big problem is third party software costs. IBM can't do much about 
that except offer a competing product or buy the offender.

And press coverage is a problem. I've read several stories over the past couple 
years talking about platform migrations. I've made myself appointments to get 
back to the magazines 6 - 9 months later to ask for a follow up story to report 
on how well it went. To date, zero follow-ups out of four requests. I realize 
we 
aren't inclined to discuss our failures, but if you're going to report on a 
project, 
aren't the results relevant ??? Shouldn't the results be more relevant than the 
plan ???

Having said all this, I'm a big proponent of using the right tool for the job. 
The 
z servers do a lot of things very well. But there are also a lot of things that 
should probably be left to other platforms. Solitaire just doesn't play well on 
my 3270 emulator, but I hear IBM is looking to offer cell chips on their z9's 
soon that might include graphics capabilities.

Every time you ask a question like this, you get responses from some who 
complain about the lack of jobs on the platform. And a few who complain 
about the lack of skilled people to fill the jobs on the platform. This is a 
highly 
dynamic industry. Whether you're running Windows or z/OS, things change by 
the minute. You have to be able to adjust and learn and move forward. A lot 
of the problems we've generated for ourselves by not being receptive to 
change and not being willing to take on the responsibility of learning without 
someone else footing the bill. If the platform does finally give in to the 
obituary 
written 25 years ago, I'll adjust. I'm flexible. I'll change platforms or 
careers. 
It's been good for me, no complaints.

These are exciting times. I'm having a hard time keeping up, and that's a good 
thing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to