On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 13:47:19 +0200, R.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Regarding modern DASD and CDS placement: even on modern DASD arrays >there is still old RESERVE on volume. I believe this is the most >important reason for keeping those CDSes separate. >
There is no reserve on couple data sets. Otherwise, you would never be able to have more than one per volume. >BTW: I was teached (by IMBer who know sysplex very well) that I should >keep separate CFRM pri and SYSPLEX pri. No mention about third volume >for LOGGER pri. > Depends on how much you are using the logger I suppose. But Health Checker will flag it regardless. In my development and sandbox sysplexes, I deleted that check since I only use 2 couple dsn volumes in those environments. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - ZFUS G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
