Lindy, >From my limited knowledge, you can not avoid SVCUPDTE.
Adding your module to DLPA does not update the entry point address in the SVC table entry unlike PLPA/FLPA/MLPA. OS will do this for you only when it finds a SVC module in PLPA/FLPA/MLPA at IPL time. Of course the name of your module should follow the standard SVC naming rule for OS to notice it. On Nov 23, 2007 4:10 PM, Lindy Mayfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From what I can gather from the docs and books, installing a new SVC > requires an IPL or a utility that uses the SVCUPDTE macro. > > If I am developing a new SVC then even if I refresh a new copy of it I > should to the SVCUPDTE macro (since an IPL each time is a bit > cumbersome). > > Is that pretty much correct? > > What about an ESR SVC 109? Can I get by adding simply the IGX00yyy > module to the LPA (with SETPROG), or do I still need to IPL or use the > SVCUPDTE macro here as well? > > Thanks, > Lindy > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO > Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html > -- Best Regards, Johnny Luo ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
