On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:57:27 -0800 Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>Ed Gould wrote: :>> After reading over the above it occurred to me that it might be :>> faintly possible to look at IBM's response (LRC FO etc) and get some :>> glimmer of what IBM's plans might be. Other than "accepted" I just :>> can't see where anyone could get a jump on anything (because of the :>> nebulous meanings of LRC and FO etc). Chances are "accepted" means :>> within 6 months and no software/hardware company on the face of the :>> earth could respond with a product in that short of time span. So :>> companies really could not gain anything by knowing IBM's response. :>In my experience, "ACCEPTED" means "ALREADY CODED". Sometimes even REJECTED means already coded. -- Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.dissensoftware.com Director, Dissen Software, Bar & Grill - Israel Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me, you should preauthorize the dissensoftware.com domain. I very rarely bother responding to challenge/response systems, especially those from irresponsible companies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
