> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Schmidt > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 11:36 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: WLM question. >
<snip> > > Sorry to see your sysplex disappear over this... ;) > > -- > Tom Schmidt The parallel sysplex disappeared when nobody wanted to pony up for the cost of a CFL. The basic sysplex is now endangered due to the CPU cost of running two z/OS images for no apparent benefit over "tinkering" with WLM. I don't really mind much. I was not convinced that any type of sysplex, in our environment, was all that much of a positive. There are some positives for tech services in the area of better testing before production. There really aren't any for applications or production control that I can see. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
