In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/05/2008
at 02:42 AM, "R.S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I can recall a situation that sysprog (bad one) has cloned several SMP/E
>environments and nobody knew (including him!) which one is the correct
>one. I met it at leas three times.
That's not a problem with SMP, but with management.
>In case of components installed from 'setup.exe' on PC *or* on mainframe
> side (I described such example: TSA), SMP/E delivery is simply
>pointless.
The fact that you don't understand the point doesn't mean that there is
none.
>The same effect can be achieved with naming a package
>'setup_ver3.21.exe'.
No.
>Did you hear about CBT ?
Finally something that I can agree with ;-)
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
