> -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL > Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 3:36 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Rexx - TRAP errors / Exception handling ? > > > >REXX is adaptable enough to fit into many niches - many that > have nothing to do with ISPF. > > Yes. But. > The ISPF limb should not be arbitrarily amputated. > As far as I could tell, all other address environments were > acceptable. > So, why not address "ISPEXEC" and address "ISREDIT". > > No criticism intended towards the list owner, but those two > environments were out of bounds. > > The very adaptability of REXX should allow for those > environments to be discussed. > They weren't. > > -
Perhaps because the questions were becoming more ISPF oriented than REXX oriented? I.e. just because you are using REXX to create an ISPF dialog, does not make REXX the correct place to ask something like: "My ISPF panel does not look correct and does not invoke the correct dialog. Why?" That is an ISPF question, not a REXX question. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology The information contained in this e-mail message may be privileged and/or confidential. It is for intended addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and could, in certain circumstances, be a criminal offense. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply and delete this message without copying or disclosing it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
