On Sat, 3 May 2008 12:23:37 -0400, J R wrote: >Probably to ensure that not just anybody can cause a deadly embrace: > Why is a deadly embrace caused by an authorized program deemed less harmful than one caused by an unauthorized program?
>"S99WTVOL / S99WTDSN / S99WTUNT / S99OFFLN / S99MOUNT : >Use care when you set these flags; setting any one of them >might cause a deadlock situation. For example, consider the >situation where JOBA owns a resource that JOBB wants and >JOBB owns a resource that JOBA wants. If one of the above >flags are on, the two jobs will wait until one job is cancelled." -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
