On Sat, 3 May 2008 14:17:44 -0400, J R wrote: >That doesn't answer my question. > I know this one!
I.e. the program may have been bound with AC=1, but into a non-authorized library; or it may have been invoked by CALL, LINK, ATTACH, or XCTL from a non-authorized parent; or there may have been a non-authorized STEPLIB catenand; any of which would cause it to run non-authorized. (Others?) >> Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 11:34:25 -0500 >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Yes the program is authorised. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
